That Instafamous Guy

Your friendly neighborhood IG Supehero

By

What #SEO really means to bloggers – So Effing Overrated

  • Follow Me on Pinterest

This is an open invitation for all of the SEO evangelists to come and purge the anti-SEO sentiment from deep within my soul. What’s the worst that could happen? It may turn out that I’m wrong, which happens up to twice a week, so I can live with that. What I have trouble living with is all the articles, tweets, and posts that claim Search Engine Optimization(SEO) is the holy grail of blogging. I don’t know about you, but I’ve already accepted the fact that I’m not going to bump Mashable, Social Media Today, or Alltop from the top results when someone searches for Social Media on Google. While SEO isn’t completely useless, it’s SO OVERRATED for most bloggers

image

PEOPLE TRUMP KEYWORDS

I’ll admit that if your website sells products or services, SEO would play a more important role in getting noticed. But what about blogs? Are people really starting their Social Media or Marketing blogs with the expectation that SEO will magically deliver millions of hits and put them on the first page on Google? Get Real, it’s a pipe dream, unless you have tens of thousands of dollars to invest. Even then, there’s no guarantee that you’ll reach the promised land. Maybe it’s worth considering when you’ve already become established with hundreds of thousands of visitors, but don’t buy into the hype before then.  Instead, find a better(and less costly) way to grow your community.

Here are a few suggestions:

Spend time creating meaningful relationships with other bloggers

Focus on adding value to other successful blogs by becoming a part of their community

Find a niche market and build credibility through your content

Get to know your audience – go beyond saying “thank you for commenting”

DARTH SEO vs LUKE SKYGOOGLE?

Last time I checked, the purpose of SEO is to optimize your website in order to rank higher on search engines. Sounds innocent enough on the surface, but when you dig deeper into the technicalities of SEO, it gets creepy. Who wants to deal with the likes of robots, spiders, and crawlers…be tempted to engage in cloaking or spamdexing… and be able to differentiate between white hats and black hats? No, stop, I know what you’re thinking – this is not the description of a Star Wars Movie. There is no Darth SEO that fights Luke Skygoogle in an epic battle of good vs evil. If that were the case, SEO would be easier because at least you could tell good from bad. In the SEO saga, the line between is fuzzy, at best.

There I said it – I’m more concerned about building the so G community from the ground up with quality people, rather than rely on search traffic, backlinks, and 5 second page visits for cool stats. Let the outcry begin, am I completely off base here? Am I missing the boat or do you agree? Lastly, do me a favor and include a link to your twitter profile if I don’t follow you already.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Easy to read, interesting and easy to understand. What more do you want from a topic-specific article? Thanks for sharing! Canvas Bags

I'm a former SEO fake blogger. It was the worst, so so so the worst. Medical waste blog? Price gun blog? Adult diaper blog? I wrote them all :/ I've since started a new project, finding SEO out in the wild where the writer has inserted some humor and humanity, and sometimes active subversion:http://www.seogonewild.tumblr.com GOOD: if you've found these posts    BETTER: if you've /WRITTEN/ these kinds of posts Wish something like this existed when I worked in SEO, just to let off steam.

Thanks for sharing your link and story, it's much appreciated. I'll be sure to check it out!

SEO is very inexpensive if you know what you're doing. There is a reason that 99% of blogs rank 900,000 or higher on Alexa and it comes down to 1 of 3 simple things. They either don't know how to properly use social media. They don't know how to properly use SEO. Or both. The fact is that for less than $100 (one time) and a few hours of work (for each keyword string you want to rank for), you can rank darn near any 3 word keyword string you want on page 1 of Google within a few weeks. Of course if ones goal isn't to monetize their blog, there is no point in caring about SEO or traffic anyway.

Truth on the last line, Robert, had to chuckle. I've ven waiting for someone such as yourself to deliver a counter blow. You bring up some good points. Now, my question is say, for example, I wanted to be on the first page of Google on a search for social media, a $100 investment would yield that result?

haha thanks. Well it just depends. "most" 3 word phrases can be put on page 1. The $100 dollar investment is one time for a specific tool to help with automation. There is a lot of work that has to go into it though especially if you are new because one will have a learning curve of course and the proper way to do things is not with "spam seo" which is quick and easy but doesn't last. There are exceptions to the 3 word phrase rule of course. You aren't likely going to take something such as "Social Media Marketing" just with 1 tool and some hard work. Although it is possible with time and effort depending on a host of other factors. However "Online Marketing Strategy" is pretty easy to attain with a strong overall website. In other words a website that has a fair amount of quality content and is frequently updated. The fact is that 98% of SEO people fall into 2 categories 1. They think they know what they are doing but they don't so they spend time on things that really doesn't matter and never get anywhere. 2. They are lazy. So in reality your competition generally comes down to Authority Sites and the 2% of SEO Guys that know what they are doing. Authority Sites can be beat but for short tail keywords it will take A LOT of work.  The 2% of SEO Guys are not likely competing against you because they are either highly niched focused on their own projects on mega keywords such as "Diet Plans". Or they have a list of clients they do SEO for which would typically be for specific products or service not specifically online related. lol sorry for the book :)

I actually appreciate the book, thank you. I'll admit I don't know nearly enough to be a force, but most of the marketing I've read really turned me off. Maybe I just need to talk to more people like you! Thanks for adding your perspective.

Dude, I am so on board with you here. I wrote about this last week, and it drives me nuts when my clients get calls from SEO folks. "Hey, there's an open spot on the first page of Google. Do you want to be on there?" . And I can see why some small business owner who knows nothing about this stuff gets excited. But wow. I hate this stuff. 

KDiddy, what a pleasant surprise to see you here. I was so busy working on our Spin Sucks album that I missed this! I'm in no way even remotely versed in SEO, but after reading the bit I have, I'm not sure I want to go to the dark side. Thanks for dropping by, Ken.

I agree completely with your point. It is meaningless to have thousands of disengaged followers, subscribers, and the like. You are correct to build a community and reach out to other bloggers. Glad you reached for me.

Amen Dwayne! I'd much rather have people like you who take the time to read and comment on my post than to accidentally end up here and close the window 5 seconds after arriving. Great Comment, thank you.

If you are providing good quality content your statement of "disengaged followers" makes no sense. Search Engine Optimization is done to target the people who are searching for what you have to offer. If you are giving them what they are looking for, they won't be disengaged. While the vast majority of average Internet users do not retweet, facebook share, etc... that is a very poor metric of enjoyment of your work. And if you are monetizing your blog, the only engagement that matters is your marketing funnel. The problem people run into with SEO is they don't understand how to target those who want what they have to offer.

People trump keywords! Yes!

Boom! Thanks Oliver

Seo = snake oil for the most part. Yes within reason it has validity but most of what people spew and sell online is snak oil.

That's the impression I have as well.. Can't shake it and haven't seen much commentary to prove otherwise.

It's important to remember that SEO is often used to mean "game the system." The people at Google are trying to display the content that is most helpful when someone enters a search phrase, and there are a lot of metrics that allow Google to determine what that content should be.  SEO is an effort to find a way around that, to drive content to the top of the listings whether it belongs there or not.  I'm extremely proud of the content that goes live on my site, but it has essentially no chance of ranking near the top of the results because the field I have chosen is extremely competitive.  Not only that, but nearly all of my competition pays thousands for SEO.  Articles are written specifically with SEO in mind, while I prefer to just write good stuff--and have others write it--and hope that in the long term, that gets me better rankings.  I don't think that SEO should be ignored completely (it just makes sense to design a page in a manner that search engines like, as long as that's not informing the content itself), but I would like to see more people put as much focus on the message as they do the delivery system!

If I had a medal to give you for a kick-ass comment, you'd definitely get it Jason. I'm writing for my audience, not for a search engine. Great points, thanks for your perspective.

I just wonder if the search engines are ever going to be able to class content based on quality, which is so subjective.

Now that's something I'd love to see.. Not sure how it would be done but I'd search at the engine that could!!

some of it depends on your industry/niche and how people generally find new content/providers. For me, with topical photographs that unknown buyers/readers search for, it is quite important. For others who rely on word of mouth, perhaps not so much

Solid points, David. In your instance I can see why it is more important Thanks!

I can't argue with you because I agree.  I am not primarily a blogger nor am I an SEO expert, but SEO  is meaningful for me when I design ecommerce sites.  However, the extent that I am willing to go to SEO a site is make sure it utilizes all the best practices for optimization.  I am not about to go hog wild with a zillion backlinks and stuffed keywords.  I believe that you need to create meaningful content, build relationships and grow organically based off of a sound foundation of adding value.

Great comment filled with great points. I believe if you have a quality product that the traffic will come. Thanks for adding some value of your own to the discussion!

I agree, SEO still has a place for some, but in I see it a decreasing in importance almost daily.

My sentiments exactly, Dan. Appreciate you sharing your thoughts.

Thanks for sharing ; now a days SEO is one of the most important part of Social Media !!

Thanks for stopping by Mithu. May I ask why you feel it is one of the most important parts of social media?

Thanks Anne - I do too :-)

SEO is a neccessary evil as far as I'm concerned, I hate it but can;t do without it :(

lol John, you sound depressed just talking about it! Do you research & implement SEO strategies on your own or does a company do it for you? Curious, if you don't mind playing 21 questions with me... What results have you had w/ it verse w/out it? What sort of site do you have?

Trackbacks

  1. [...] background-position: 50% 0px; background-color:#222222; background-repeat : no-repeat; } http://www.sogenius.com (via @seotweetz) – Today, 9:25 [...]

  2. [...] bloggers – So Effing Overrated « So Genius Posted by MagMan on 28/03/2012 in Papers | ∞ sogenius.com – So Genius [...]